dc.contributor.creator | McCafferty, Des | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-08T15:33:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-08T15:33:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | McCafferty, D. (1999) Regionalisation and the Geography of Poverty. Poverty Today, No. 43. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0791 0096 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10395/2166 | |
dc.description.abstract | There are been considerable debate on regionalisation since the Government's decision to divide the country into two regions to maximize EU structural aid and the subsequent EU decision to confer Objective 1 status on a revised 13-county region. A fundamental question is whether such regional division best serves the national interest. It is clear, however, that the new regionalisation bears little relation to the spatial pattern of poverty in Ireland. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Poverty Today | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Poverty Today;43 | |
dc.subject | Regionalisation, EU structural funds, poverty, spatial inequality | en_US |
dc.title | Regionalisation and the Geography of Poverty | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.type.supercollection | all_mic_research | en_US |
dc.type.supercollection | mic_published_reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.version | Yes | en_US |