Show simple item record

dc.contributor.creatorMurtagh, Elaine
dc.contributor.creatorHegarty, Lynda M.
dc.contributor.creatorMair, Jacqueline L.
dc.contributor.creatorKirby, Karen
dc.contributor.creatorMurphy, Marie H.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-19T11:13:32Z
dc.date.available2018-11-19T11:13:32Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationHegarty, L.M., Mair, J.L., Kirby, K., Murtagh, E., Murphy, M.H. (2016) 'School-based interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour in children: a systematic review.' AIMS Public Health 3(3), pp. 520-541. DOI: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.520.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10395/2393
dc.descriptionSchool-based interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour in children: a systematic reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractProlonged, uninterrupted periods of sedentary time may be associated with increased risk of Type II diabetes, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality even if the minimum recommended levels of daily physical activity are achieved. It is reported that children spend approximately 80% of their day engaged in sedentary behaviours. Since children spend a large portion of their waking time at school, school-based interventions targeting excessive or interrupted periods of sedentary time have been investigated in a number of studies. However, results of the effectiveness of studies to-date have been inconsistent. Aim: To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of school-based interventions designed to reduce sedentary behaviour on objectively measured sedentary time in children. Methods: Five electronic databases were searched to retrieve peer-reviewed studies published in English up to and including August 2015. Studies that reported objectively measured sedentary time before and after a school-based intervention to reduce sedentary time were included in the review. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration method. Results: Our search identified eleven papers reporting eight interventions. Studies focused on the physical environment, the curriculum, individual in-class activities, homework activities or a combination of these strategies. Three studies reported decreases in sedentary time following intervention. Study follow-up periods ranged from immediately post-intervention to 12 months. None of the studies were judged to have a low risk of bias. Conclusions: Multicomponent interventions which also include the use of standing desks may be an effective method for reducing children’s sedentary time in a school-based intervention. However, longer term trials are needed to determine the sustained effectiveness of such interventions on children’s sedentary time.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAIMS Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries3;3
dc.rights.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689814/pdf/publichealth-03-03-520.pdfen_US
dc.subjectSedentary behaviouren_US
dc.subjectInterventionen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.subjectSchoolen_US
dc.subjectStanding desksen_US
dc.titleSchool-based interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour in children: A systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.supercollectionall_mic_researchen_US
dc.type.supercollectionmic_published_revieweden_US
dc.description.versionYesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.520


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record