MIRR - Mary Immaculate Research Repository

    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • FACULTY OF ARTS
    • Department of English Language and Literature
    • English Language and Literature (Peer-reviewed publications)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • FACULTY OF ARTS
    • Department of English Language and Literature
    • English Language and Literature (Peer-reviewed publications)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of MIRRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Resources

    How to submitCopyrightFAQs

    Ireland, Empire and Utopia: Irish Postcolonial Criticism and the Utopian Impulse

    Citation

    Flannery, Eoin (2010) ‘Ireland, Empire and Utopia: Irish postcolonial criticism and the utopian impulse ‘, Textual Practice, 24(3), 453-81
    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Flannery, Eoin (2010) Ireland Postcolonialism and Utopia.pdf (193.4Kb)
    Date
    2010
    Author
    Flannery, Eoin
    Peer Reviewed
    Yes
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Flannery, Eoin (2010) ‘Ireland, Empire and Utopia: Irish postcolonial criticism and the utopian impulse ‘, Textual Practice, 24(3), 453-81
    Abstract
    This article is a response to Bill Ashcroft’s ‘Critical Utopias’, which appeared in this journal in 2007. In his earlier piece, Ashcroft offered a summary genealogy of the historical and literary historical links between Utopian Studies and Postcolonial Studies.While ‘CriticalUtopias’ was a salutary intervention in this discursive dialogue between these two fields; by including the Irish case this article is designed as an extension to the geographical and historical limits of Ashcroft’s piece. Therefore, my article offers a substantial outline of some recent work within Irish postcolonial studies and identifies the Utopian energies that sustain such criticism. Positioning Irish postcolonial critiques as differential, yet conversant, engagements with the processes of late twentieth century Irish modernisation, the article treats the issues such as: the philosophical and political subtleties of Edmund Burke; the civic republicanism of the United Irish movement; the imbricated political, cultural and social movements of the Irish Revival; the Socialist nationalism of James Connolly, as well as the recalcitrant local practices of counter-modern social formations mined by Connolly’s proto-subalternist historiography. My ‘Response’, therefore, is intended as a supplement to Ashcroft’s initial intervention, but also as a reminder that Ireland should not be easily elided from postcolonial debates, as it so often has been. Finally, the article has a particular focus on matters that pertain to the utopic in terms of the literary historical and the historiographical within Irish postcolonial studies, and will, one hopes, catalyse future interventions that might engage with other facets of Irish colonial history and postcolonial criticism.
    Keywords
    Ireland
    Marxism
    Celtic Tiger
    Enlightenment
    Imperialism
    Irish Revival
    James Connolly
    Postcolonialism
    Modernisation
    Language (ISO 639-3)
    en_US
    Publisher
    Routledge Taylor and Francis
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10395/2054
    Collections
    • English Language and Literature (Peer-reviewed publications)

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     


    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback