MIRR - Mary Immaculate Research Repository

    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • FACULTY OF ARTS
    • Department of English Language and Literature
    • English Language and Literature (Peer-reviewed publications)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • FACULTY OF ARTS
    • Department of English Language and Literature
    • English Language and Literature (Peer-reviewed publications)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of MIRRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Resources

    How to submitCopyrightFAQs

    Postcolonial Passages: Migration and Cinematic Form in Michael Haneke’s "Hidden" and Alan Gilsenan’s "Zulu 9"

    Citation

    Flannery, Eoin (2011) ‘Postcolonial passages: Migration and cinematic form in Michael Haneke’s Hidden and Alan Gilsenan’s Zulu 9’, Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 47(1) 65-77
    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Flannery, E.( 2011)Postcolonial Passages Migration and cinematic form in Michael Hanekes hidden and Alan Gilsenans Zulu.pdf (294.9Kb)
    Date
    2011
    Author
    Flannery, Eoin
    Peer Reviewed
    Yes
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Flannery, Eoin (2011) ‘Postcolonial passages: Migration and cinematic form in Michael Haneke’s Hidden and Alan Gilsenan’s Zulu 9’, Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 47(1) 65-77
    Abstract
    This essay examines two recent cinematic productions from France and Ireland, respectively: Michael Haneke’s Hidden and Alan Gilsenan’s Zulu 9. These two films are considered comparatively in terms of migration, postcolonial identity and global capital. But the essay also focuses on how the formal features of the two cinematic, visual texts act and interact with the primary thematic concerns cited above. Thus, the essay foregrounds technical form as a crucial aspect of any consideration of contemporary postcolonial texts, not just cinematic or visual. The essay explores how different “forms” can co‐exist within one text and charts how these chafe against each other, particularly in Haneke’s Hidden, as competing sides in France’s colonial history come into conflict in the present – it is the issue of form that most explicitly underscores the violent tensions of the past erupting in the present. Likewise, Gilsenan’s much shorter film makes the viewer highly self‐conscious about the ways in which we view the tragedies and the hardships of “the other”. As it is an Irish film, Ireland’s own protracted colonial history obviously bears upon our reactions to this specific and tragic consequence of neo‐colonialism charted by Gilsenan.
    Keywords
    Ireland
    France
    Migration
    Neo‐colonialism
    Cinema
    Language (ISO 639-3)
    eng
    Publisher
    Taylor and Francis
    Rights
    Copyright © Routledge Taylor and Francis. Full publication can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17449855.2011.533957
    DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2011.533957
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10395/2056
    Collections
    • English Language and Literature (Peer-reviewed publications)

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     


    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback