Show simple item record

dc.contributor.creatorMcCafferty, Des
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-08T15:33:36Z
dc.date.available2018-03-08T15:33:36Z
dc.date.issued1999-04
dc.identifier.citationMcCafferty, D. (1999) Regionalisation and the Geography of Poverty. Poverty Today, No. 43.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0791 0096
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10395/2166
dc.description.abstractThere are been considerable debate on regionalisation since the Government's decision to divide the country into two regions to maximize EU structural aid and the subsequent EU decision to confer Objective 1 status on a revised 13-county region. A fundamental question is whether such regional division best serves the national interest. It is clear, however, that the new regionalisation bears little relation to the spatial pattern of poverty in Ireland.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPoverty Todayen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPoverty Today;43
dc.subjectRegionalisation, EU structural funds, poverty, spatial inequalityen_US
dc.titleRegionalisation and the Geography of Povertyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.supercollectionall_mic_researchen_US
dc.type.supercollectionmic_published_revieweden_US
dc.description.versionYesen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record