MIRR - Mary Immaculate Research Repository

    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • FACULTY OF ARTS
    • Department of Psychology
    • Psychology (Peer-reviewed publications)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • FACULTY OF ARTS
    • Department of Psychology
    • Psychology (Peer-reviewed publications)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of MIRRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Resources

    How to submitCopyrightFAQs

    The model of motivational dynamics in sport: resistance to peer influence, behavioral engagement and disaffection, dispositional coping, and resilience

    Citation

    Nicholls AR ,Morley D and Perry JL (2016) The Model of Motivational Dynamics in Sport: Resistance to Peer Influence, Behavioral Engagement and Disaffection, Dispositional Coping, and Resilience. Front. Psychol. 6:2010. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02010
    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Main article (580.3Kb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Perry, John
    Nicholls, Adam R.
    Morley, David
    Peer Reviewed
    Yes
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Nicholls AR ,Morley D and Perry JL (2016) The Model of Motivational Dynamics in Sport: Resistance to Peer Influence, Behavioral Engagement and Disaffection, Dispositional Coping, and Resilience. Front. Psychol. 6:2010. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02010
    Abstract
    The Model of Motivational Dynamics (MMD; Skinner and Pitzer, 2012) infers that peers influence behavioral engagement levels, which in turn is linked to coping and resilience. Scholars, however, are yet to test the MMD among an athletic population.The purpose of this paper was to assess an apriori model that included key constructs from the MMD, such as resistance to peer influence, behavioral engagement and disaffection, coping, and resilience among athletes. Three hundred and fifty-one athletes (male n=173, female n=178; Mag e=16.15 years) completed a questionnaire that measured each construct. Our results provide support for the model. In particular, there were positive paths between resistance to peer influence and behavioral engagement, behavioral engagement and task-oriented coping, and task-oriented coping with resilience. There was also a positive path between resilience and resistance to peer influence, but a negative path from resistance to peer influence to behavioral disaffection. Due to the reported benefits of enhancing resistance to peer influence and behavioral engagement, researchers could devise sport specific interventions to maximize athletes’ scores in these constructs.
    Keywords
    Behavior
    Peers
    Mental toughness
    Motivation
    Motivational climate
    Sport
    Language (ISO 639-3)
    eng
    Publisher
    Frontiers
    License URI
    https://fpsyg-06-02010%20(1).pdf
    DOI
    10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02010
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10395/2214
    Collections
    • Psychology (Peer-reviewed publications)

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     


    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback