MIRR - Mary Immaculate Research Repository

    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • FACULTY OF ARTS
    • Department of Psychology
    • Psychology (Peer-reviewed publications)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • FACULTY OF ARTS
    • Department of Psychology
    • Psychology (Peer-reviewed publications)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of MIRRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Resources

    How to submitCopyrightFAQs

    Evidence for the reliability and validity, and some support for the practical utility of the two-factor consideration of future consequences scale-14 (Pre-published version)

    Citation

    McKay, M.T., Perry, J.L., Percy, A., Cole, J.C. (2016) 'Evidence for the reliability and validity, and some support for the practical utility of the two-factor consideration of future consequences scale-14.' 98(1), pp. 133-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.097.
    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Main article (296.7Kb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Perry, John
    McKay, Michael T.
    Percy, Andrew
    Cole, Jon C.
    Peer Reviewed
    Yes
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    McKay, M.T., Perry, J.L., Percy, A., Cole, J.C. (2016) 'Evidence for the reliability and validity, and some support for the practical utility of the two-factor consideration of future consequences scale-14.' 98(1), pp. 133-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.097.
    Abstract
    Researchers have proposed 1-factor, 2-factor, and bifactor solutions to the 12-item Consideration of Future Consequences Scale (CFCS-12). In order to overcome some measurement problems and to create a robust and conceptually useful two-factor scale the CFCS-12 was recently modified to include two new items and to become the CFCS-14. Using a University sample, we tested four competing models for the CFCS-14: (a) a 12-item unidimensional model, (b) a model fitted for two uncorrelated factors (CFC-Immediate and CFC-Future), (c) a model fitted for two correlated factors (CFC-I and CFC-F), and (d) a bifactor model. Results suggested that the addition of the two new items has strengthened the viability of a two factor solution of the CFCS-14. Results of linear regression models suggest that the CFC-F factor is redundant. Further studies using alcohol and mental health indicators are required to test this redundancy.
    Keywords
    Consideration of future consequences scale
    Exploratory structural equation modeling
    Bifactor solution
    Language (ISO 639-3)
    eng
    Publisher
    Elsevier
    License URI
    https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0191886916302501/1-s2.0-S0191886916302501-main.pdf?_tid=d70a9563-c191-4803-85e9-10cc59e1b9c2&acdnat=1540902317_6335069e985e69cb57cc578e2b
    DOI
    10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.097
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10395/2321
    Collections
    • Psychology (Peer-reviewed publications)

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     


    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback