MIRR - Mary Immaculate Research Repository

    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • FACULTY OF ARTS
    • Department of English Language and Literature
    • English Language and Literature (Peer-reviewed publications)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • FACULTY OF ARTS
    • Department of English Language and Literature
    • English Language and Literature (Peer-reviewed publications)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of MIRRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Resources

    How to submitCopyrightFAQs

    Corpus-based function-to-form approaches (Pre-published version)

    Citation

    O’Keeffe, A. (2018) “Corpus-based function-to-form approaches”. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider and W. Bublitz (Eds) Methods in Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 587 – 618.
    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Book Chapter (1016.Kb)
    Date
    2018
    Author
    O'Keeffe, Anne
    Peer Reviewed
    Yes
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    O’Keeffe, A. (2018) “Corpus-based function-to-form approaches”. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider and W. Bublitz (Eds) Methods in Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 587 – 618.
    Abstract
    This chapter sets out to explore the options for function-to-form research in the context of corpus pragmatics. Corpus-based function-to-form research approaches are used in pragmatics research to explore speech acts and related phenomena, using the function rather than the form as the starting point. Corpus studies more commonly begin with a form and, in pragmatic studies, work towards the functional analysis of these forms (i.e. form-to-function approach). However, when looking at a particular speech act, it can be challenging to find it in a corpus using form-based searches. It is possible to look at a dataset manually so as to code all instances of the speech act in the corpus, however, there is a threshold of corpus size beyond which this becomes implausible. Other systematic options and solutions have emerged such as using Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices (IFIDs) (e.g. sorry for apologies), typical features (e.g. positive adjectives, such as beautiful, for compliments) and metacommunicative expressions (e.g. using the word compliment to retrieve compliments). The paper will also look at some emerging approaches based on using collocational profiles of IFIDs to identify speech acts in very large corpora.
    Keywords
    Corpus
    Function
    Form
    Approaches
    Corpus pragmatics
    Language (ISO 639-3)
    eng
    Publisher
    Mouton de Gruyter
    License URI
    https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/457155
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10395/2666
    ISBN
    978-3-11-042492-8
    Collections
    • English Language and Literature (Peer-reviewed publications)

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     


    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback